meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
projects:stm:log [2025/06/15 18:29] – [Day 2025-06-15 (rahix)] rahixprojects:stm:log [2025/06/16 07:51] (current) – [Day 2025-06-15 (rahix)] rahix
Line 37: Line 37:
  
 {{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_20-28.png?400|}} {{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_20-28.png?400|}}
 +
 +Settings during the experiments above:
 +
 +  * ''Probenvorspannung'': Maximum
 +  * ''Sollstrom'': 0.322V (= 322pA)
 +  * ''I'': Minimum
 +  * ''P'': Maximum
 +
 +Now changing the settings somewhat in hopes of getting the control loop more tight:
 +
 +  * ''Probenvorspannung'': Maximum
 +  * ''Sollstrom'': 0.144V (= 144pA)
 +  * ''I'': 9 turns up (out of 10)
 +  * ''P'': 9 1/8 turns up (out of 10)
 +
 +You can see the faster I-response at least:
 +
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_20-50.png?400|}}
 +
 +It seems the noise has increased since yesterday.  We don't have values from before, but right now, seeing ~80mV of noise overlayed over the tunneling current signal.
 +
 +After some time, the control loop settled down quite a bit, assumingly because process disturbances decreased for some unknown reason:
 +
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_20-56.png?400|}}
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_21-00.png?400|}}
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_21-01.png?400|}}
 +
 +Managed to increase the setpoint current to 456pA:
 +
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-06-15_21-05_1.png?400|}}
 +
 +Finally tried putting the lid onto the STM for noise shielding, but I think I crashed the tip way too hard during the process as I couldn't achieve stable tunneling again afterwards...
 +
 +Should create a new tip next time and then retry more gently.  Also X/Y control is probably a good next step.
 ==== Day 2025-06-14 (rahix, k8ik, hugo, q3k, ln, zoe) ==== ==== Day 2025-06-14 (rahix, k8ik, hugo, q3k, ln, zoe) ====