meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
projects:optics:log [2026/02/22 02:20] – [Day 2026-02-21 (k8ik)] rahixprojects:optics:log [2026/04/14 08:22] (current) – [Day 2026-04-04 (k8ik, rahix, many guests)] rahix
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lab Notes for Optics Experiments ====== ====== Lab Notes for Optics Experiments ======
  
-==== Day 2026-02-21 (k8ik) ====+==== Day 2026-04-04 (k8ik, rahix, many guests) ==== 
 +We presented our low-cost optics and the interferometer at EH23!  Watch our talk here: [[https://media.ccc.de/v/eh23-budget-beams-laser-experiments-in-a-hacker-lab|Budget Beams – Laser Experiments in a Hacker Lab]] 
 + 
 +{{:projects:optics:2026-04-04-interferometer-eh23.jpg?600|}} 
 + 
 +During the event, our laser diode broke (well, rahix fed it too much voltage really) so we scrambled to disassemble a DVD drive and extract the red 650nm diode from it. We kept the collimation optics from the DVD drive and hot-glued the entire subassembly to an optics mount.  It took 3 attempts (3 DVD drives) to not immediately kill the new diode again. 
 + 
 +We managed to demonstrate the fringe movement from the piezo quite a few times.  We borrowed a different power supply to drive it.  This one seems to lead to a slow ramp-up of voltage (fringes move slowly when turning on) and an abrupt cutoff (fringes fall back very quickly when turing off). 
 + 
 +Stability was quite alright with the reduced isolation setup as long as nobody touched the table. 
 +==== Day 2026-04-01 (k8ik, rahix) ==== 
 +Set up the interferometer experiment again, but with "analog" readout (i.e. just a viewing screen where the pattern is enlarged). 
 + 
 +Tried driving the Z-axis piezo of the STM head with +20V.  We can see movement!  When turning on the voltage, the pattern immediately jumps.  When turning it back off, it slowly drifts back to its original state. 
 + 
 +Eyeballed the movement to be somewhere below λ/2, so <300nm.  But for any proper measurement, we need to do digital readout again. 
 + 
 +Getting the laser stable enough to see the movement without noise is not easy. The mechanics hold up plenty fine. 
 +==== Day 2026-02-21 (k8ik, rahix) ====
  
 We successfully coupled our shitty Aliexpress laser into the also high quality single mode fiber. However, we do see a beautiful beam but also what could be higher modes in the output, meaning the fiber is either broken at the end, the collimator has some issues or the fiber is indeed a multimode fiber. Most likely explanation right now: The fiber is a "broadband single mode fiber" for infrared (not specified) meaning it could allow for higher modes at 650nm. We successfully coupled our shitty Aliexpress laser into the also high quality single mode fiber. However, we do see a beautiful beam but also what could be higher modes in the output, meaning the fiber is either broken at the end, the collimator has some issues or the fiber is indeed a multimode fiber. Most likely explanation right now: The fiber is a "broadband single mode fiber" for infrared (not specified) meaning it could allow for higher modes at 650nm.
Line 8: Line 26:
 {{:projects:optics:signal-2026-02-21-212805_003.jpeg?400|Weird mode}} {{:projects:optics:signal-2026-02-21-212805_003.jpeg?400|Weird mode}}
  
-Put a collimator on the other fiber end and aimed it at our camera to take some beam pictures.  First, here is a capture of a higher mode:+We put a collimator on the other fiber end and aimed it at our camera to take some beam pictures. 
 + 
 +Wrote a little script which outputs the average intensity across the camera frame as a single number so we can tune the fiber coupling against it [[https://git.fa-fo.de/fafo/k8ik-stm/src/commit/3ecbe0b53f74b1d71ca9628accaadcc8cf0977f9/Calculations/live_intensity.py|live_intensity.py]]. 
 + 
 +Even after adjustment, only very little power coming out of the fiber.  After tuning, we readjusted the exposure of the camera to try imaging full beam pictures (but this only partially worked because the auto exposure setting of the camera is completely broken). 
 + 
 +First, here is a capture of a higher mode:
  
 {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-multimode.png?400|}} {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-multimode.png?400|}}
  
-With a bit more tweaking, we end up seeing a nice gaussian:+With a bit more tuning of the fiber coupling, we end up seeing some much nicer beam shapes:
  
 {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-01.png?400|}} {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-01.png?400|}}
 {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-02.png?400|}} {{:projects:optics:2026-02-22-fiber-beam-02.png?400|}}
 +
 +The curve does not look gaussian which is a bit worrying. Current assumption is that this is still a higher transversal mode that just looks close enough.
 ==== Day 2026-01-31 (k8ik) ==== ==== Day 2026-01-31 (k8ik) ====
 Aliexpress quality fiber and collimators arrived: Aliexpress quality fiber and collimators arrived: