meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
projects:stm:log [2025/09/07 04:08] – [Day 2025-09-07 (rahix, q3k, hugo)] rahixprojects:stm:log [2025/09/30 22:27] (current) – Remove nolink rahix
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Lab Notes for the Scanning Tunneling Microscope ====== ====== Lab Notes for the Scanning Tunneling Microscope ======
  
-==== Day 2025-09-07 (rahix, q3k, hugo) ====+==== Day 2025-09-20 (rahix) ==== 
 +Modelled more of the as-built of the current STM setup in mechanical CAD so we have a reference model: 
 + 
 +{{:projects:stm:cad-stm.png?900|}} 
 +==== Day 2025-09-07 (rahix) ==== 
 +Took the video capture from yesterday, of the beam bouncing from the STM off a mirror 2.35m away and back to the camera on the STM and ran some analysis on the data. 
 + 
 +Analysis works like this:  For each frame, we find the beam center.  Then we look at the spectral content of the displacement in X and Y directions.  Check the full notebook for details: ''Laser-Wobble.ipynb'' from [[https://git.fa-fo.de/fafo/k8ik-stm/src/branch/main/Calculations|Calculations/]] ([[https://git.fa-fo.de/fafo/k8ik-stm/src/branch/main/Calculations/rendered/Laser-Wobble.md|Rendered Notebook]]). 
 + 
 +Here is the final figure: 
 + 
 +{{:projects:stm:2025-08-07-vibration-spectral-density.png?900|}} 
 + 
 +The most interesting result is the peak highlighted by the red line.  The red line marks the theoretical resonance frequency of the vibration isolation system that we had calculated in the past.  Seeing a peak right at this frequency sparks a lot of confidence! 
 + 
 +The results are limited up the 15 Hz because of the 30 fps video capture.  But towards the right of the figure, the data becomes pretty meaningless anyway as the displacements are too small for the camera to pick up already. 
 +==== Day 2025-09-06 (rahix, q3k, hugo) ====
 Rebuilt the entire experiment to clean up the space and install some shelving.  All connections are remade but the setup has not been reverified to tunneling. Rebuilt the entire experiment to clean up the space and install some shelving.  All connections are remade but the setup has not been reverified to tunneling.
  
Line 501: Line 517:
 Played a bit more with the [[https://git.fa-fo.de/fafo/k8ik-stm/src/branch/main/Calculations/Spring-Dimensioning.ipynb|calculations for the mass-spring-damper system]] to see where we are at, comparing to commercially available systems: Played a bit more with the [[https://git.fa-fo.de/fafo/k8ik-stm/src/branch/main/Calculations/Spring-Dimensioning.ipynb|calculations for the mass-spring-damper system]] to see where we are at, comparing to commercially available systems:
  
-{{:projects:stm:dampening-2025-06-08.png?nolink&400|}}+{{:projects:stm:dampening-2025-06-08.png?400|}}
  
  
Line 518: Line 534:
 Calculated the damping behavior of our setup: Calculated the damping behavior of our setup:
  
-{{:projects:stm:damping-ratio-2025-06-08.png?nolink&400|}}+{{:projects:stm:damping-ratio-2025-06-08.png?400|}}
  
 EMI Box: EMI Box:
Line 595: Line 611:
 Removed the formwork from the conrete block we poured on friday.  The block is so nice! Removed the formwork from the conrete block we poured on friday.  The block is so nice!
  
-{{:projects:stm:stm-concrete-weight.jpg?nolink&400|}}+{{:projects:stm:stm-concrete-weight.jpg?400|}}
  
   * Lessons learned:   * Lessons learned:
Line 613: Line 629:
 Poured a concrete weight for the vibration isolation system: Poured a concrete weight for the vibration isolation system:
  
-{{:projects:stm:concrete-pouring.jpg?nolink&400|}}+{{:projects:stm:concrete-pouring.jpg?400|}}
  
   * Lessons learned:   * Lessons learned: