meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
equipment:zeiss-dsm-962:log [2026/07/18 19:13] – [Day 2026-07-16] rahixequipment:zeiss-dsm-962:log [2026/07/31 23:40] (current) – [Day 2026-07-31 (0ff, q3k, and more)] 0ff
Line 3: Line 3:
 > //This page is a lab notebook. It documents the work done in the lab and our thoughts, theories, and findings related to it. Everything you read here is work in progress and not final results. We believe it is best to have our lab notes out in the open, because it gives more detailed insight into what worked for us and what didn't. Of course you can also use this page to follow our progress!// > //This page is a lab notebook. It documents the work done in the lab and our thoughts, theories, and findings related to it. Everything you read here is work in progress and not final results. We believe it is best to have our lab notes out in the open, because it gives more detailed insight into what worked for us and what didn't. Of course you can also use this page to follow our progress!//
  
 +==== Day 2026-07-31 (0ff, q3k, and more) ====
 +Removed the beam-blanker again since we suspect it creates a weirdly shaped beam image (the emission image looks 0ff ever since we installed it).
 +
 +Disassembled the inner liner tube again to check it for suspected missing apertures - we are indeed missing 2x 3mm (OD) apertures as well as 2x retaining clips.
 +
 +Checked for the weird artifacts and couldn't see them as strong as before, but they are not gone. Emission image looks like a half moon shape still.
 ==== Day 2026-07-18 (q3k, rahix) ==== ==== Day 2026-07-18 (q3k, rahix) ====
 For reference, this is the current sample configuration in the SEM: For reference, this is the current sample configuration in the SEM: