meta data for this page
  •  

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
projects:optics:log [2026/08/08 20:13] – [Day 2026-08-07 (rahix, guest)] rahixprojects:optics:log [2026/08/29 22:20] (current) – [Day 2026-08-29 (leah, rahix)] rahix
Line 4: Line 4:
 > //This page is a lab notebook. It documents the work done in the lab and our thoughts, theories, and findings related to it. Everything you read here is work in progress and not final results. We believe it is best to have our lab notes out in the open, because it gives more detailed insight into what worked for us and what didn't. Of course you can also use this page to follow our progress!// > //This page is a lab notebook. It documents the work done in the lab and our thoughts, theories, and findings related to it. Everything you read here is work in progress and not final results. We believe it is best to have our lab notes out in the open, because it gives more detailed insight into what worked for us and what didn't. Of course you can also use this page to follow our progress!//
  
 +==== Day 2026-08-29 (leah, rahix) ====
 +Investigating whether we can just buy an ND filter for our specific microscope. There is a small cover glass on the front with ø=36mm. Seems to have a M34x0.5 thread? There seem to be some "37mm" ND filters available that seem they could fit.
 +
 +Mom, we have ND filter at home (2 pieces of polarization filter foil):
 +
 +{{:projects:optics:20260829_nd-filter-at-home.jpg?400|}}
 +
 +But we are still not seeing much improvement.
 +
 +Removed the brass rod for now as it is just in the way for experimentation.
 +
 +After lots of trial and error, we achieved //some// coupling again. But we never got it really good and unfortunately the magnification of our microscope is just not good enough to see the focus spot on the end of the fiber.
 +
 +Clamped the fiber with a protective sleeve now so we don't damage it again. Sometimes, this leads to the fiber being angled. This is a problem as even a few degrees already lead to much much worse coupling efficiency.
 +
 +----
 +
 +With the light output we got, coupled it into the interferometer setup. We get really nice fringes, though unfortunately hard to take a picture of...
 +
 +{{:projects:optics:20260829_213134967.night.jpg?600|}}
 +
 +Added some 26cm path length difference to the interferometer to see if we get some amount of coherence length. Result: We do! Fringe contrast has not visibly decreased.
 +
 +Going back to the topic at hand:
 +
 +The assembly is probably not stiff enough as it stands to meaningfully perform alignment. We removed the vibration isolation again to get some more stiffness from resting directly on the table surface and this helps quite a bit... Achieved better coupling than in the earlier attempts today. Should probably place the whole assembly onto a breadboard or metal base plate.
 +
 +Also we need to investigate what we can use to better check focal plane alignment of the fiber end, with the microscope not working out.
 +
 +Considering to just automate the focus search entirely instead of manual stepping. But backlash of the openflexure is considerable which may make this rather difficult.
 ==== Day 2026-08-07 (rahix, guest) ==== ==== Day 2026-08-07 (rahix, guest) ====
 Remounted the microscope to get a better view of the fiber end. It still overexposes which currently makes it impossible to see where the beam waist is. Thinking about strapping an ND filter to the microscope objective... Remounted the microscope to get a better view of the fiber end. It still overexposes which currently makes it impossible to see where the beam waist is. Thinking about strapping an ND filter to the microscope objective...